Legal Opinion

Sambursky v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 2008No. 20070177, 20070182PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Paul Sambursky appeals from a district court order, which was entered after a remand in Sambursky v. State, 2006 ND 223, 723 N.W.2d 524 (“Sambursky I ”), denying his post-conviction relief application based upon his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm, concluding the district court did not err in finding Sambursky failed to meet his burden of proving his trial counsel’s representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness.

I

[¶ 2] Facts relevant to this case are set forth in Sambursky I, 2006 ND 223, 723 N.W.2d 524, and we will not…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Heckelsmiller v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Greywind v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Flanagan v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. DeCoteau v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. DELVO v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Clark v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Greywind v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Peterka v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Curtiss v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API