Legal Opinion
Harley-Davidson, Inc. v. Minstar, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided November 5, 1993No. 90-C-1245PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
RANDA, District Judge.
This case involves a dispute between Plaintiff, Harley-Davidson, Inc., (“Harley-Davidson”), and Defendants Minstar, Inc., (“Mins-tar”), AMF, Inc., (“AMF”), U.S.A., U.S. Department of Defense, and the U.S. Department of the Navy (collectively, “the Navy”), over liability for clean-up of a contaminated industrial site. The dispute centers on two agreements 1 and a settlement in State Court arising from one of the agreements. Minstar and AMF assert that the Agreements effectively transferred liability and, hence, the cost of clean-up from Minstar and AMF…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jarecki v. G. D. Searle & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Conroy v. AniskoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Mardan Corporation v. C.G.C. Music, Ltd. And MacMillan Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Aldridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- The Marmon Group, Inc. v. Rexnord, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harley-Davidson, Incorporated v. Minstar, Incorporated, and Amf IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Curtis T. Bedwell & Sons, Inc. v. Geppert Bros.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
- SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Rohm and Haas Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- United States v. LangDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1994