Legal Opinion

Surles v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 15, 1918No. 881PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Indictment for murder. Before Judge Ilighsmith. Wayne superior court. February 16, 1918.

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. Where the evidence relied upon by the State to establish the fact of the homicide discloses circumstances of • mitigation or justification, such evidence does not raise a presumption of malice. Dowdy v. State, 96 Ga. 653 (23 S. E. 827); Green v. State, 124 Ga. 343 (52 S. E. 431; Mann v. State, 124 Ga. 760 (53 S. S. 224, 4 L. R. A. (N. S.) 934); Elliott v. State, 132 Ga. 758 (64 S. E. 1090). Accordingly, as the evidence in this ease relied on to prove the homicide also tended to show mitigation and justification, it was error to charge the jury: “Where one is charged with murder and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mann v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Green v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  4. Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. Franklin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Eagan v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Mullis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  3. Smaha v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  4. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  5. Jordon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API