Legal Opinion

Roberts v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 15, 1939No. 12947PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Justice.

Grounds 1 and 2 of the amendment to the motion for a new trial complain because the defendant’s request to be sworn and examined by counsel for the State and for the defendant was denied in the following language: “I am going to let him make a statement. The law does not allow a defendant to be sworn and examined.” In support of these grounds it is contended that the provisions of the Code, § 38-415, are designed for the benefit and protection of a defendant; and that the part of the section to the effect that the prisoner shall not be compelled to answer any question on…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Powell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Mann v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
  4. Wolfson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1900
  5. Lindsay v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Joyner v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  3. Chandler v. GatelyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  4. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  5. United States v. Dexter Andre Davis, A/K/A Winston RichardsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API