Legal Opinion

Anderson-Dunham, Inc. v. Lee Rubber & Tire Corp.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 27, 1964No. 16321PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIXON, Chief Justice.

Appellee Lee Rubber & Tire Corporation, hereinafter called Lee, sued appellant Anderson-Dunham, Inc., for alleged conversion of a large number of truck tires, on which Lee claims a chattel mortgage lien superior to a chattel mortgage lien claimed by appellant. Seago Contracting Company, mortgagor, hereinafter called Seago, was also made a party defendant, but the cause as to Seago was severed from the cause as to Anderson-Dunham.

After a trial before the court without a jury judgment was rendered for Lee for $9,132.62, the balance due by Seago, to whom the tires had been…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Taylor v. HarrisonTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Guinn v. LokeyTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Scaling v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  4. Totten v. HoughtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Hawn Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Morgan v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  2. Finger Furniture Co. v. Chase Manhattan BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  3. Miller v. DoughtyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Pickering v. First Pyramid Life Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Wallis v. McGuffeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API