Wallis v. McGuffey
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Justice.
Appellee’s suit against appellant was upon a purported verified account pursuant to Rule 185, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. Appellant excepted to the sufficiency of the itemized account because same did not comply with the rule. The trial court overruled the exception and rendered judgment for appellee. Appellant assails the judgment in three points of error in which he contends that the purported sworn account was insufficient in that (1) the verification to the account failed to state that it was due and (2) the itemization contained in the account, listing only dates…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Griswold v. CarlsonTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Becker, Smith & Page, Inc. v. Wm. Cameron & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Anderson-Dunham, Inc. v. Lee Rubber & Tire Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Wall & Carr v. J. M. Radford Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- A. Harris & Co. v. Grinnell Willis & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mega v. Anglo Iron & Metal Co. of HarlingenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Biscamp v. Zeno Carpet CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Benthall v. GoodwinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Texan Man's Shop, Inc. v. Nunn-Bush Shoe CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Howard v. WeisbergCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.