Legal Opinion

Truck Insurance Exchange v. Rutherford

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 2017No. Case No. 20150858PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Direct Appeal

Justice Himonas,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

¶ 1 Danny Rutherford suffered extensive injuries when the work van he was driving was hit by a vehicle that had run a red light. Mr. Rutherford sought compensation from both his employer’s workers’ compensation insurer and Truck Insurance Exchange (TIE), which provides Mr. Rutherford’s employer with underinsured motorist coverage. Mr. Rutherford seeks double recovery, arguing that Utah Code section 31A-22-805.3(4)(c)(iii)—which states that underin-sured motorist coverage “may not be reduced by benefits provided by workers’…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. MartinezUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Wilson v. IHC Hospitals, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Price Development Co., LP v. Orem CityUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Gibbs M. Smith, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1997
  5. McArthur v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fire Ins Exchange v. OltmannsUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Reperex, Inc. v. Coldwell Banker CommercialUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Carter v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Hinton v. Midwest Family Mutual InsuranceUtah Supreme Court · 2025
  5. Nielsen v. Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API