Hemric v. Reed & Prince Manufacturing Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Judge.
In an appeal from a decision by the Industrial Commission, the scope of review is limited to a determination of whether the Commission’s findings of fact are supported by competent evidence and whether the conclusions of law are supported by the findings. In order to be compensable under the Workers’ Compensation Act, an injury must result from an accident arising out of and in the course of employment. G.S. 97-2(6); Barham v. Food World, 300 N.C. 329, 266 S.E. 2d 676, rehearing denied, 300 N.C. 562 (1980). Whether the injury arose out of and in the course of employment is a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gallimore v. Marilyn's ShoesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Barham v. Food World, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Harden v. Thomasville Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Robbins v. NicholsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Hollar v. Montclair Furniture Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Demery v. Perdue Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Calderwood v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Pittman v. Twin City Laundry & CleanersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Dildy v. MBW Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Bason v. Kraft Food Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.