Legal Opinion

People v. Kelly

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 10, 2013No. E055263PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McKINSTER, J.

In this case, we consider whether, after the operative date of the Criminal Justice Realignment Act of 2011 (Stats. 2011, 1st Ex. Sess. 2011-2012, ch. 12, § 1; Pen. Code, § 1170, subd. (h))1 (hereafter the Realignment Act or the Act), a defendant whose probation is revoked must serve his or her previously imposed and suspended sentence in state prison, according to the terms of the original sentence, even if the defendant otherwise qualifies for a term in county jail under the terms of the Act. The Act explicitly applies only to “any person sentenced on or after October 1,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. ButtramCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. People v. YartzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. People v. CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. People v. RamirezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  2. The People v. WilcoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. People v. MontroseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. The People v. MorenoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. People v. SheehyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API