State v. Ward
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
I
Defendant first argues that the trial court erred in finding that the victim was competent to testify and in allowing her to testify. The victim was four years old when she testified and the alleged offenses occurred when she was two years of age. Defendant argues that because of the victim’s age and because of her inconsistent answers as to whether she knew what it meant to tell the truth, she was not competent to testify. G.S. 8C-1, Rule 601(b) provides:(b) Disqualification of witness in general. — A person is disqualified to testify as a witness when the court determines…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. FearingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re ClappCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. PersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. WoodyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- State v. MeadowsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.