Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Quenzer

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided September 20, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

This is an application by one of two residuary legatees and executrices for a “ substantial ” distribution of assets in the estate. Eight months have expired since the issuance of letters, and the allegations of the petition, which in this respect are not controverted, indicate that the assets in the hands of the fiduciaries consist of $47,618.50 in cash, $92,630.21 in stocks and other securities, and $19,220.67 in miscellaneous other allegedly good items, making a total of assets of $159,469.38. Aside from executorial commissions and attorneys’ fees which are not fixed in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of GreenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. American Historical Society, Inc. v. GlennNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. In re the Estate of SitkinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of BommerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  2. In re the Estate of BursteinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  3. In re the Estate of McGarryNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  4. In re the Estate of BrodinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962
  5. In re the Estate of LudlamNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API