Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Bommer

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 22, 1936PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

It is fortunately rare that a court is placed in the slightly anomalous and somewhat embarrassing situation inherent in the present litigation.

As a member of the Decedent Estate Commission, upon the recommendation of which section 18 of the Decedent Estate Law was incorporated into the statutes of this State, the court, as an individual, is completely conversant with the motives and purposes which actuated the Commission, and by reason of numerous conferences with legislative leaders in respect to the proposed enactments, and the fact that the recommendations of the Commission were…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  2. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  4. King v. . TalbotNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  5. Jacobus v. . ColgateNew York Court of Appeals · 1916

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. In re MatthewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  2. Fortune v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  3. In re the Estate of SchmidtNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
  4. City of Buffalo v. BeckNew York Supreme Court · 1954
  5. In re the Estate of ClarkNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API