Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Burstein

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided November 21, 1934PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

The question of law involved in the present controversy has many times been broached since the passage of the various enactments revising the laws respecting the property of decedents’ estates which became effective on September 1, 1930, but so far as the court is aware, it has never been determined in any reported decisiou. The problem, in brief, concerns the right of a statutory distributee to occupy premises of which an intestate died seized, in opposition to the wishes of the administrator, and without the payment of any rental or return for use and occupation.

In its original…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rathbone v. . HooneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Waxson Realty Corp. v. RothschildNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. In re the Estate of EbbetsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  4. Wilcox v. WilcoxNew York Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Williams v. FischleinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of LimbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. In re the Estate of FryNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961
  3. In re the Accounting of SmithNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957
  4. In re the Estate of BakerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  5. In re the Estate of SeviroliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API