Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Brodin

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided February 21, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John D. Bennett, S.

This is a proceeding pursuant to section 217 of the Surrogate’s Court Act in which the petitioners request *652that the executrix he cited to show cause why she should not pay the claims herein.

The respondent executrix has defaulted in that she failed to properly answer the petition thereon and has not formally rejected the claim.

A proceeding pursuant to section 217 of the Surrogate’s Court Act is a special proceeding in which the court is called upon to ascertain certain facts and to exercise its discretion. The application and use of said section is subject to uncertainty.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of QuenzerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of MilbankNew York Surrogate's Court · 1975
  2. In re the Estate of GoldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API