Legal Opinion
Arawana Mills Co. v. United Technologies Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 7, 1992No. Civ. A. 5:91CV00711 (JAC)PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
JOSÉ A. CABRANES, District Judge:
Pending before the court is defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (filed Dec. 12, 1991), which was submitted for decision after oral argument on February 3, 1992.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Arawana Mills Company (“Ara-wana”) owns property on Newell Street in Southington, Connecticut (“the Property”), which is described in paragraph 5 of the Complaint (filed Oct. 21, 1991) (“Complaint”). Prior to 1963, it was undeveloped farmland. Since May of that year, defendant United Technologies Corporation (“UTC”) has had sole and continuous possession of the…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Raytheon Co. v. McGraw-Edison Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1997
- Graham Oil Co. v. BP Oil Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Calabrese v. McHughDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
- Murray v. Bath Iron Works Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 1994
- Prisco v. State of NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.