State v. Maldonado
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHERRY RADACK, Chief Justice.
This is a State’s appeal from the trial court’s granting of a motion to suppress evidence. Appellee, Sergio Maldonado, was charged with possession of less than one gram of a controlled substance. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.115 (Vernon Supp.2004). Maldonado filed a motion to suppress, contending that the evidence seized in connection with his detention and arrest was seized without a valid warrant, probable cause, or other lawful authority, thereby violating his federal and state constitutional rights. The trial court granted Maldonado’s motion…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Willover v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Sims v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. BallmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Gansky v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Brian Victorian v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015
- Eric Eugene Gansky v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2005
- Eric Eugene Gansky v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.