Legal Opinion

State v. Maldonado

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided October 14, 2004No. 01-03-00774-CRPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHERRY RADACK, Chief Justice.

This is a State’s appeal from the trial court’s granting of a motion to suppress evidence. Appellee, Sergio Maldonado, was charged with possession of less than one gram of a controlled substance. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.115 (Vernon Supp.2004). Maldonado filed a motion to suppress, contending that the evidence seized in connection with his detention and arrest was seized without a valid warrant, probable cause, or other lawful authority, thereby violating his federal and state constitutional rights. The trial court granted Maldonado’s motion…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  4. Willover v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  5. Sims v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. BallmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  2. Gansky v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  3. Brian Victorian v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015
  4. Eric Eugene Gansky v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2005
  5. Eric Eugene Gansky v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API