Tate v. Cambridge Commons Apartments of Indianapolis
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Judge
Appellant-plaintiff John Tate appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee-defendant Cambridge Commons Apartments of Indianapolis (Cambridge Commons) on his complaint for negligence. Specifically, Tate argues that the enactment of the Comparative Fault Act 1 superseded the application of §§ 343 and 343A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts (1965). Alternatively, Tate argues that there is a material question of fact regarding whether Cambridge Commons breached the duty it owed to Tate as an invitee because Cambridge Commons should have…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Burrell v. MeadsIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Douglass v. IrvinIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Get-N-Go, Inc. v. MarkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
- Henshilwood v. Hendricks CountyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Hottinger v. Trugreen Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. BaxterIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Countrymark Cooperative, Inc. v. HammesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- John E. Servies v. The Kroger Company (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015