Legal Opinion

Tate v. Cambridge Commons Apartments of Indianapolis

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 27, 1999No. 49A05-9811-CV-550PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Judge

Appellant-plaintiff John Tate appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee-defendant Cambridge Commons Apartments of Indianapolis (Cambridge Commons) on his complaint for negligence. Specifically, Tate argues that the enactment of the Comparative Fault Act 1 superseded the application of §§ 343 and 343A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts (1965). Alternatively, Tate argues that there is a material question of fact regarding whether Cambridge Commons breached the duty it owed to Tate as an invitee because Cambridge Commons should have…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Burrell v. MeadsIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Douglass v. IrvinIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Get-N-Go, Inc. v. MarkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Henshilwood v. Hendricks CountyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Hottinger v. Trugreen Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. BaxterIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Countrymark Cooperative, Inc. v. HammesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. John E. Servies v. The Kroger Company (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API