Legal Opinion

Burgess v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 14, 1999No. 96 Civ. 6949(DNE)Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

EDELSTEIN, District Judge.

Petitioner Steven Burgess (“Petitioner” or “Burgess”), pro se, brought this present motion to vacate his conviction and sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (“ § 2255 motion” or “habeas petition”) on September 13, 1996. Petitioner claims (1) that in determining his sentence, this Court improperly attributed to him some of the narcotics found in the possession of a co-conspirator, and (2) that defense counsel was ineffective for failing to seek a reduction in sentence because of Petitioner’s allegedly minor role in the offense. Having reviewed…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API