Legal Opinion
Murrell v. Union Pacific Railroad
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided April 7, 2008No. Civil 06-97-AAPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
AIKEN, District Judge:
Pending before the court are three separate motions: two motions for summary judgment made by (1) the Union Pacific Railroad Company (“Union Pacific”), National Passenger Railroad Corporation dba Amtrak (“Amtrak”), George M. Landrock (“Landrock”), and Craig E. Billings (“Billings”) (collectively, “railroad defendants”); and (2) the City of Salem (“City”); and (3) a separate motion to strike filed by railroad defendants. On March 31, 2008, the court held oral argument on these motions. Railroad defendants’ motions are granted in part and denied in part.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gauthier v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2009
- MD Mall Associates, LLC v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Veit v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2011
- Johns v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 2016
- Driesen v. Iowa, Chicago & Eastern Rr Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.