Legal Opinion

Albuquerque Foundry & MacHine Works v. Stone

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1930No. 3332PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SIMMS, J.

Stone owned an oil and gas lease on a section of land belonging to another. After drilling a considerable distance, he lost certain tools in the well and suspended operations. Olney claimed to be an expert in fishing for and recovering lost drilling tools and equipment and agreed with Stone to recover the articles from the well for $2,500, if he succeeded, and nothing if he failed. Stone consented to this and permitted his drilling machinery on the site to be used in the effort. Olney hired labor and had the Albuquerque Foundry & Machine Works make for him certain…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Basshor v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
  2. Gordon Hardware Co. v. San Francisco & San Rafael RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Kanawha Oil & Gas Co. v. WennerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Jones-Noland Drilling Co. v. BixbyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Ripley v. Cochiti Gold Mining Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. WelshNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. El Paso Electric Co. v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  3. Dysart v. YoungbloodNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Boone v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Hondo Oil & Gas Co. v. Pan American Petroleum Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API