Beall Pipe & Tank Corp. v. Tumac Intermountain, Inc.
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SWANSTROM, Judge.
This appeal comes to us from the grant of a Rule 41(b) motion for involuntary dismissal. The plaintiff-appellant, Beall Pipe and Tank Corporation, supplied mainline irrigation pipe to the defendant, Tumac Intermountain, Inc. Tumac had contracted with the Unqueras to sell and install the pipe as part of an irrigation system Tumac built for the Unqueras in Lemhi County, Idaho. The Beall pipe, laid underground, was used to divert water from Patterson Creek to farm lands being purchased by the Unqueras from people named Richardson. There the water would be applied by means of a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chamberlain v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
- Anselmo v. SebastianiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Hendrix v. Gold Ridge Mines, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1936
- Keenan v. BrooksIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- Layrite Products Company v. LuxIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Projects Unlimited, Inc. v. Copper State Thrift & Loan Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
- Rohr v. RohrIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Hap Taylor & Sons, Inc. v. Summerwind Partners, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
- Koski v. Seattle First National Bank (In Re Koski)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 1992
- Fairfax v. RamirezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.