Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Commercial Investors Corp. v. Zangerle

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1933No. 23694PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The taxpayer’s action to enjoin the improvement and the respondent from issuing the voucher to the relator was begun May 22, 1932. The present case was instituted by the relator on June 7th following. The sole question for determination then becomes whether the pendency of the taxpayer’s action, to enjoin this public improvement and to restrain the respondent from issuing the voucher, requires this court to reach the conclusion that a clear right to the mandatory writ prayed for is not shown, there being no affirmative showing that the taxpayer’s suit was not instituted in good…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Tax Commission v. FaustOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  2. State Ex Rel., Standard Oil Co. v. HarrisOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  3. State Ex Rel. Tax Commission v. FryOhio Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. First National Bank v. Village of BotkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  2. State Ex Rel. Robertson Inv. Co. v. PattersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1934
  3. State ex rel. Levin v. Sheffield LakeOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State, Ex Rel. v. Conserv. Dist.Ohio Supreme Court · 1940
  5. State ex rel. Akron Coal Co. v. Bd. of Directors of Muskingum Watershed Conservancy DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API