Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Akron Coal Co. v. Bd. of Directors of Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1940No. Nos. 27985 and 27986Published

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

Relators contend that under Section 6, Article IV of the Ohio Constitution, giving Courts of Appeals original jurisdiction in mandamus, *487and under Sections 6828-70 and 12284, General Code, the Court of Appeals of Guernsey county was authorized to entertain these actions and to issue the writs.

Section 6828-70, General Code, is a special statutory grant of power to conservancy districts to enforce certain of their orders by the extraordinary writ of mandamus (State, ex rel. Miami Conservancy Dist., v. Baden, 130 Ohio St., 251, 198 N. E., 865), and Section 12284, General Code, simply authorizes…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Wahl v. SpeerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  2. Abiaca Drainage Dist. v. Albert Theis & Sons, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1939
  3. State Ex Rel. Commercial Investors Corp. v. ZangerleOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  4. State Ex Rel. Miami Conservancy District v. BadenOhio Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API