State Ex Rel. First National Bank v. Village of Botkins
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
Counsel in their briefs and in oral argument have discussed many questions of fact and law. We think that the record presents a three-fold barrier to relator’s right to the relief for which it prays.
First. Has the relator a plain and adequate remedy at law¶
The record makes abundantly clear without contradiction that relator is the owner and holder of 14 anticipatory notes of $1,000 each, dated November 15? 1940, due and payable on May 15,1941, bearing interest at the rate of 4% per annum until paid, and that the notes are past due and unpaid.
Relator has filed no action to recover upon the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. White v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1936
- State Ex Rel. Bassichis v. ZangerleOhio Supreme Court · 1933
- State Ex Rel. Cope v. CooperOhio Supreme Court · 1930
- State Ex Rel. Commercial Investors Corp. v. ZangerleOhio Supreme Court · 1933
- State, Ex Rel. v. Conserv. Dist.Ohio Supreme Court · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State ex rel. Sibarco Corp. v. City of BereaOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- State ex rel. Huntington Insurance Agency, Inc. v. DuryeeOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Stanley v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1946
- State ex rel. Case v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State ex rel. GMS Management Co. v. CallahanOhio Supreme Court · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.