State Ex Rel. Tax Commission v. Faust
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKinkade, J.
This is an action in mandamus brought by the state tax commission against E. M. Faust, as auditor of Mahoning county, Ohio. The authority for bringing the action by the tax commission is found in General Code, Sections 1465-32, 5624-8, 5624-9, and 5548, as amended, which became effective July 16, 1925.
Section 5548 as amended required the auditor of Mahoning county to reappraise the real estate of that county (other than real estate belonging to public utilities) in the year 19'25; no appraisement of such real estate having been made in the years 1922, 1923 and 1924.
The auditor declined to…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Torbet v. KilgoreOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- State Ex Rel. Commercial Investors Corp. v. ZangerleOhio Supreme Court · 1933
- Bell v. State Ex Rel. Methodist Book ConcernOhio Supreme Court · 1935
- State Ex Rel. Tax Commission v. FryOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- Ide Trucking Co. v. Schneider, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.