Legal Opinion

Proctor v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 2017No. 15-CF-309Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

On consideration of the appellee’s petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, and appellant’s opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED .by the merits division*, that the appellee’s petition for rehearing is granted in part, and this court’s March 16, 2017,***opinion is amended by revising the last sentence on pages 403-04, with accompanying new footnote 11. In addition, (1) on page 406, lines 12-13 have been changed to read “and apparently did not own the gun”; (2) on page 406, line 15, “furthered” has been changed to “further” and (3) on page 407, line 11 has been changed to read,“knew the…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rivas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Curry v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. NeimanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Moore v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Jamel Evans v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API