Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Potter
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided November 19, 2008No. Civil Action 06-cv-01881-REB-CBSPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL
BLACKBURN, District Judge.
The matter before me is Defendant’s Motion for New Trial [# 95],. filed July 10, 2008. I deny the motion.
I. JURISDICTION
I have subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (federal question).
II. STANDARD OF REVIEW
When a case has been tried to a jury, a new trial may be granted “for any of the reasons for which new trial have heretofore been granted in actions at law in the courts of the United States.” Fed. R.CrvP. 59(a)(1). A motion for new trial “is not regarded with favor and should only be granted with…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Frank L. SPULAK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. K MART CORPORATION, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Greene v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. James Easter, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Heno v. Sprint/United Management Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Clyde W. HINDS and Mary Lee Hinds, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jackson v. PotterDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2008
- TRUSTID, Inc. v. Next Caller Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2021