Jackson v. Potter
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR REMITTITUR
BLACKBURN, District Judge.
The matter before me is Defendant’s Motion for Remittitur [# 96], filed July 10, 2008. I deny the motion.
I.JURISDICTION
I have subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (federal question).
II.STANDARD OF REVIEW
“It is a fundamental legal principle that the determination of the quantum of damages in civil cases is a fact-finder’s function. The trier of the facts, who has the first-handed opportunity to hear the testimony and to observe the demeanor of the witnesses, is clothed with a wide latitude and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Blanke v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Smith v. Northwest Financial Acceptance, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Hugh L. Bennett v. Bobby Joe LongacreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Sheets v. Salt Lake CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Murphy Oil USA Inc v. Trivental IncCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Blangsted v. Snowmass-Wildcat Fire Protection DistrictDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2009
- CMI Roadbuilding Inc v. Specsys IncDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2024
- Harp v. BarrDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2023