Legal Opinion
Patricia Johnson Michael Au France v. City of Cincinnati
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 2, 2003No. 00-4477PublishedCited by 141 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., C.J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which EDMUNDS, D.J. joined. GILMAN, J. (pp. 506-519), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
OPINION
BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR, Chief Circuit Judge.
The City of Cincinnati appeals the decision of the district court declaring the City’s drug-exclusion ordinance, Cincinnati Municipal Code § 755, unconstitutional on its face, and unconstitutional as applied to plaintiffs Patricia Johnson and Michael Au France, and awarding plaintiffs attorney fees. For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.
I
A
On August…
2Cases cited86 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by141 opinions
- League of United Latin American Citizens v. BredesenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Sheila J. Bell v. Ohio State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Andre Johnson v. Jeremy MoseleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- EJS Properties, LLC v. City of ToledoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.