Legal Opinion

Zak v. Gypsy

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 2, 1979No. 48835PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YETKA, Justice.

This court granted petition for writ of certiorari to state treasurer, custodian of the special compensation fund, relator, to review a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals, filed March 23, 1978, affirming a decision of the compensation judge, filed October 28, 1977, in which he determined that Terrance Zak is to receive specified disability benefits from relator as a result of injuries Zak suffered in the course of employment with the now dissolved band named “Gypsy.” We affirm.

In about July, 1973, Terrance Zak, employee, received a telephone call from Jim…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  2. Bloom v. American Express Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  3. Kolbeck v. MyhraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  4. Lauer v. Tri-Mont Cooperative CreamerySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  5. Pfeil v. Worthington Lady Elks Lodge No. 2287Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Matey v. Estate of DemberSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  2. Tibbetts v. Leech Lake Reservation Business CommitteeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Matter of BowersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Matter of GrafstromCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  5. United Steelworkers, Local 6115 v. Quadna Mountain Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API