Legal Opinion
Matter of Grafstrom
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 15, 1992No. C1-92-756PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
Appellant was initially committed as mentally ill and dangerous. After a review hearing, the trial court committed him for an indeterminate period as mentally ill and dangerous. On appeal, Grafstrom alleges deprivation of his statutory and due process rights because the petition failed to properly inform him that the commitment was for being mentally ill and dangerous. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
FACTS
A petition for judicial commitment of appellant, filled out by Police Chief Curt Hau-gen, was filed with the district court. Near the top, underneath a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gardner v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Minnesota, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Lange v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Benson v. Northern Gopher Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- In Re WretlindSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- State Ex Rel. Anderson v. United States Veterans HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Brenda Sue Loewen.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014