Legal Opinion

American Satellite Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 13, 1992No. 525-89CPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

Plaintiff, American Satellite Company, contends that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (“NASA”) was contractually bound to launch one of its satellites on the Shuttle, and that the actions of the President in the wake of the loss of the Shuttle Challenger unilaterally abrogated those rights in favor of other Shuttle customers. As a result, it claims that the United States is liable to it, either for breach of contract or for a constitutional taking, for the cost of reprocurement on a private launch vehicle, approximately $70 million. The case is before…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Yee v. City of EscondidoSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Harisiades v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1951

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Centex Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  2. Blaze Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  3. Hughes Communications Galaxy, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
  4. American Satellite Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  5. American Satellite Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API