Legal Opinion

United States v. University Hospital, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Parents of Baby Jane Doe, Intervenors-Defendants-Appellees

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 23, 1984No. 679, Docket 83-6343PublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEORGE C. PRATT, Circuit Judge:

This expedited appeal presents the question whether Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 794 (Supp. V 1981), and one of its implementing regulations, 45 C.F.R. § 84.61 (1982) (incorporating 45 C.F.R. § 80.6(c) (1982)), authorize the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to obtain access to medical records maintained by defendant University Hospital concerning a seriously deformed newborn infant, identified only as Baby Jane Doe, whose parents have refused to consent to certain surgical procedures necessary…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. Susan Mary Kamen v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., Patricia McDonald and Carol BuckhamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  2. Bowen v. American Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Reed v. Columbia St. Mary's Hosp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  4. Fitzgerald v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  5. McGugan v. Aldana-BernierCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API