Legal Opinion

Mazanec v. Aetna Insurance Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1973PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DYER, Chief Justice.

This is a workmen’s compensation case presenting first the issue of the correctness *617of the holding of the trial judge that the action of Fred Mazanec in refusing to submit to surgery offered by the insurance carrier of the employer was reasonable, and such refusal would not suspend the workmen’s compensation benefits due employee.

T.C.A. § 50-1004 reads in pertinent part as follows:

If the injured employee refuses to comply with any reasonable request for examination or to accept the medical or specialized medical services which the employer is required to furnish…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Floyd v. Tennessee Dickel Distilling CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Lunsford v. A. C. Lawrence Leather Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Minton v. LeonardTennessee Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Sullivan v. GreenTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Phillips v. Fleetguard Division of Cummins Engine Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hohenberg Bros. Co. v. Missouri Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1979
  2. Bingham v. Dyersburg Fabrics Co., Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Masters v. Industrial Garments Manufacturing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Harris v. Kroger Co., Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Paul Lane Roark v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API