Paul Lane Roark v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
O’BRIEN, Justice.
This is a workers’ compensation action, appealed by the plaintiff below, in which the primary issue is the amount of the award for permanent partial disability. Plaintiff also questions the court’s judgment in declining to leave the decree open for the payment of future medical expenses.
Plaintiff sustained an injury to his back while working in the course and scope of his employment. Treatment of the injury required surgery to perform a lumbar lami-nectomy. The chancellor found that Mr. Roark had sustained a fifteen percent (15%) permanent partial disability to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Humphrey v. David Witherspoon, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1987
- Corcoran v. Foster Auto GMC, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1988
- Employers Insurance Co. of Alabama v. HeathTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
- Lunsford v. A. C. Lawrence Leather Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1949
- Underwood v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lindsey v. Strohs CompaniesTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- White v. Werthan IndustriesTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- Bazner v. American States Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
- Stephens v. Henley's Supply & Industry, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1999
- Bazner v. American States Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.