Legal Opinion

Montana Immigrant Justice Alliance v. Bullock

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 2016No. DA 15-0213PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter

¶1 In November 2012 the voters of Montana passed Legislative Referendum 121 (LR 121) by a wide margin. The referendum, codified at § 1-1-411, MCA, served to deny certain state services to individuals defined by the law to be “illegal aliens.” Before the law went into effect, the Montana Immigrant Justice Alliance (MIJA) sought declaratory *320and injunctive relief from its provisions. The District Court granted MIJA’s request in part, denied it in part, and awarded MIJA attorney fees. The State appeals both the District Court’s order granting MIJA summary judgment and its order awarding MIJA…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Arizona v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. De Canas v. BicaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Valle Del Sol v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Citizens for a Better Flathead v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Bullock v. FoxMontana Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Park Co. Environmental v. DEQMontana Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Arnone v. City of BozemanMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Davis v. Jefferson Cnty. Election OfficeMontana Supreme Court · 2018

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API