Legal Opinion

Adams v. Wallace

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 27, 1923No. 12304PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

FOSTER, O.

H. M. Adams, plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, sued John •N. AA'aHace and Sarah F. AA’allace, defendants in error, defendants below, in the district court of Logan county, Okla., to set aside an alleged fraudulent conveyance. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the court below.

From a judgment of tbe trial court sustaining defendants’ demurrer and motion to dismiss his petition, the plaintiff appeals and assigns as error the action of the trial court in sustaining the demurrer and dismissing his action. Plaintiff’s petition is as follows:

“Comes now said…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tyler v. TylerIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Small v. SmallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  3. Shelby v. ZieglerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Farrell v. PuthoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  5. Bennett Ex Rel. Wilson v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wallace v. BrooksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. JirasekMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. First Nat. Bank of Barnsdall v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Keaton v. LittleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
  5. Lewis v. ManningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API