Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Jirasek

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1931No. Docket No. 97, Calendar No. 34,940PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I am unable to agree with the conclusion of Mr. Justice McDONALD that plaintiffs' bill of complaint should be dismissed. In an opinion filed by him the circuit judge made the following determinations:(1) That the defendant Charles Jirasek was a party to the fraudulent conspiracy which rendered plaintiffs herein liable to the Detroit Savings Bank for the resultant loss.(2) That the quitclaim deed of property known as Sylvan Shores in Oakland county from Charles Jirasek to his brother Joseph is in fact and in law a mortgage, that it was not made in good faith as security for prior indebtedness…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. American Surety Co. v. ConnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. McGunn. v. HanlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Conway v. RaphelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
  4. Morse v. RoachMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Lipskey v. VoloshenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lind v. O. N. Johnson Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  2. Rossman v. HutchinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  3. CAHILL-MOONEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. AyresMontana Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Churchill v. PalmerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Grand Rapids Trust Co. v. LutesMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API