Legal Opinion

Dauel v. Rose

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 16, 1926No. 17379PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ESTES, C.

Parties appear in the same order as in the trial court. Plaintiff sued J. E. Rose and wife for judgment for $1,570 on a promissory note, and for judgment of foreclosure on certain real estate against the Roses and numerous other defendants. Defendants pleaded payment. From a judgment on directed verdict for defendants, plaintiff appeals. On August 5, 1919, J. E. Rose and wife executed a mortgage on their farm to secure said note that day given to the Conservative Loan Company, due in 1929. On September 4, 1919, said note and mortgage were assigned to plaintiff, Dauel, but…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chase v. Commerce Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Keel v. Titan Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  2. Bell v. TollefsenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Sherrill v. ColeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. American Life Ins. Co. of Detroit v. BrianNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
  5. State National Bank of Shawnee v. BatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API