Legal Opinion

California Fruit Exchange v. Morris Henry and Anthony Spracale, Partners, T/a Spracale Fruit Company

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 17, 1950No. 10189_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff has appealed from the judgment of the district court, 89 F.Supp. 580, upon an appeal by the defendants from a reparation order of the Secretary of Agriculture under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 1930, 7 U.S.C.A. § 499a et seq. The Secretary of Agriculture had made a reparation award of $2,119.40 with interest representing the plaintiff’s damages resulting from the rejection by the defendants of two cars of grapes which they had purchased from the plaintiff. In the appeal proceeding in the district court the plaintiff sought a verdict for the amount of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. California Fruit Exchange v. HenryDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1950

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sutton v. CombsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
  2. United States Ex Rel. E & R Construction Co. v. Guy H. James Construction Co.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1972
  3. Vance v. ReedDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1980
  4. Harry Edison Hackworth v. William H. Hiatt, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
  5. John J. Trombetta Co. v. Goldstein & ProcacciDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API