Legal Opinion

Harry Edison Hackworth v. William H. Hiatt, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 16, 1950No. 13293PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Notwithstanding appellant, in previous proceedings, including one under Sec. 2255, Title 28 U.S.C.A. and several by habeas corpus, had made, and had had decided against him on full hearing, the same contentions, his petition for habeas corpus was entertained and a full hearing was granted him below. This appeal is from the judgment upon that hearing, which, in accordance with the judgments in the previous proceedings, rejected appellant’s claims as unfounded and denied the relief he sought.

It is quite plain that the judgment must be affirmed. It is quite plain, too, that the abuse of process…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. California Fruit Exchange v. Morris Henry and Anthony Spracale, Partners, T/a Spracale Fruit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. California Fruit Exchange v. HenryDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API