Legal Opinion

Verner v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 4, 1931No. 13906PublishedCited by 18 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

— The offense is knowingly possessing a forged instrument with intent to pass same as true; the punishment, confinement in the penitentary for three years.

The count in the indictment under which appellant was convicted follows the form laid down in Willson’s Texas Criminal Forms, 4th Edition, at page 219. It was not averred that appellant knowingly possessed the instrument, it being alleged, in substance, that appellant did unlawfully and fraudulently have in his possession said instrument, with intent to use and pass the same as true. After alleging that the instrument was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gilbraith v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Nichols v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  3. Jennings v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. Fry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Burks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Landers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Robledo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Parks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Haney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API