Legal Opinion

Fry v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 16, 1918No. 4390PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

The indictment in the first count charged forgery, and in the second passing a forged instrument. The count charging the passing was alone submitted to the jury. So the forgery count passed out, and upon which in future trials he will stand acquitted.

There are a great many bills of exception reserved to the introduction of testimony, and several exceptions properly pointed out errors in the court's charge. The State seems to rely upon the case of Fry v. State, 78 Tex.Crim. Rep.. There is a marked distinction between that and the present case. That opinion recites in quotation an agreement as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Verner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. McMahan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1960
  3. State v. MagnusonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Texas Osage Co-Operative Royalty Pool, Inc. v. CruzeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  5. Lily v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API