Legal Opinion

Haney v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 29, 1969No. 41835PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ONION, Judge.

The offense is attempting to pass as true a forged instrument; the punishment, five years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections.

The State’s evidence reflects that on the afternoon of July 22, 1968, the appellant entered the Super Duper Store in Abilene, Texas, selected a few items described as “trash groceries” and then presented to the checker, Randy James, a $63.21 check and requested that it be cashed. The check in question, payable to the appellant, was drawn on the First National Bank of Abilene and signed “M. S. Hester, Building & Repair Co.”

Being…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tarwater v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954
  2. Tarwater v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954
  3. Nichols v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  4. Montgomery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Verner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Medellin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Shippy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Farris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. McBride v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API