Legal Opinion
Cehrs v. Northeast Ohio Alzheimer Research Center
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 7, 1997No. 4:95 CV 403PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
O’MALLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Katherine Cehrs brings this action against defendants Northeast Ohio Alzheimer Research Center and Windsor House, Inc. (collectively, “Windsor”). Windsor is Cehrs’s former employer. Cehrs claims that when Windsor terminated her, it violated (1) the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.; (2) the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq.;. (3) Ohio’s anti-discrimination statute, Ohio Rev. Code § 4112.02(A); and (4) Ohio common law prohibiting tortious breach of public policy.
Windsor moves for…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Melanie Satterfield v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Donahoo v. Master Data CenterDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- Duncan v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Kirkland v. St. Elizabeth HospitalDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2000
- Moore v. United International Investigative Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.