Legal Opinion

Duncan v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 31, 2000No. 99-7073PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*484Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON.

Dissenting opinion filed by Chief Judge EDWARDS.

KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge:

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) challenges the district court’s denial of judgment as a matter of law on the claims Jimmy Duncan brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq. (1994), and for which a jury returned a verdict awarding Duncan $250,000 in compensatory damages: $125,000 for the “decision not to reasonably accommodate [him]” and $125,000 “as a result of [WMA-TA’s] decision to…

Also in this document: Dissent; Per curiam.

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Ansonia Board of Education v. PhilbrookSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McGill, Thu v. Munoz, GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
  2. Stone v. St. Joseph's Hosp. of ParkersburgWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Evans v. Davis Memorial Goodwill IndustriesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
  4. Lloyd v. AshcroftDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  5. Headfirst Baseball LLC v. ElwoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API