Legal Opinion

In re McEnaney

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided October 9, 1998No. 98-381-APublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This case came before the Supreme Court pursuant to a petition for discipline filed by Disciplinary Counsel. Article III, Rule 24, of the Supreme Court Rules of Disciplinary Procedure, entitled “Proceedings in cases involving conviction of crime,” provides, in pertinent part, as follows:

“An attorney admitted to practice in this State who is convicted in a court of record of a crime which is punishable by imprisonment for more than one (1) year in this or any other jurisdiction may * * * be ordered to appear before the court to show cause why his or her admission to the bar should not…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of AlmonteSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  2. Carter v. ColeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. In Re TreinenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
  3. In the Matter of HunterSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  4. MATTER OF McENANEYSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API