Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Thompson
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided December 17, 2001No. Misc. (Subtitle AG) No. 16, Sept. Term, 2000Published
1Opinion of the Court
786 A.2d 763 (2001)
367 Md. 315
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND
v.
Gary E. THOMPSON.
Misc. (Subtitle AG) No. 16, Sept. Term, 2000.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
December 17, 2001.
Melvin Hirshman, Bar Counsel and James P. Botluk, Asst. Bar Counsel for the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland.
No argument on behalf of the Respondent.
Argued before BELL, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, RAKER, WILNER, CATHELL, HARRELL, KARWACKI, ROBERT L. (Ret., specially assigned), JJ.
HARRELL, J.
Pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-709(a) [1], Bar Counsel, on behalf of the Attorney Grievance Commission (Petitioner) and at the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Tucker v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- State v. FabritzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Condon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.