Legal Opinion
In the Matter of Hunter
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided October 8, 2009No. 2009-208-M.PPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER
This came before the court at its conference on September 15, 2009 pursuant to a petition for discipline filed by Disciplinary Counsel. Article III, Rule 24 of the Supreme Court Rules of Disciplinary Procedure entitled “Proceedings in cases involving conviction of crime,” provides, in pertinent part, as follows:
“An attorney admitted to practice in this State who is convicted in a court of record of a crime which is punishable by imprisonment for more than one (1) year in this or any other jurisdiction may * * * be ordered to appear before the court to show cause why his or her…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of AlmonteSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
- In re McEnaneySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
- Carter v. ColeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990
- In Re CoiaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
3Cited by5 opinions
- Matter of CiolliSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
- In Re HunterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- In the Matter of MoscoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
- In the Matter of RussoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
- Matter of CasaleSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010