Legal Opinion
In Re Treinen
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided March 28, 2006No. 29,424PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
{1} This matter is before the Court following attorney disciplinary proceedings conducted according to the Rules Governing Discipline. This Court is called upon to resolve two issues. First, whether this Court has the authority to impose discipline on an attorney who has pled no contest to a criminal act and who has been given a conditional discharge pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 31-20~13(A) (1994). And second, whether there may be an exception in this case to this Court’s general rule that attorneys on probation for a criminal offense will not be permitted to practice law. See In re…
3Cases cited18 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Anaya v. McBrideNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
- State Ex Rel. Norvell v. Credit Bureau of Albuquerque, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. HerbstmanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. FairbanksNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- In re SegalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- Stein v. Disciplinary Bd. of Supreme Court of NMCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- State v. HarrisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
- Roy D. Mercer, LLC v. ReynoldsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
- In re OppenheimNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. LassiterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.